Fernanda Labrana vs Denislava Glushkova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jul at 11:03 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Labrana vs D. Glushkova

CHI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BUL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Labrana 1 - 0 Glushkova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fernanda Labrana winning 2 and Denislava Glushkova winning 1. The last match between Fernanda Labrana and Denislava Glushkova was at the W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen, 02-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Fernanda Labrana getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Labrana | 1 |
| Glushkova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen(07-02-25)
F. Labrana vs D. Glushkova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.01% (141-125) | Career Total W/L | 62.55% (152-91) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
F. Labrana vs D. Glushkova Match Preview:
- Who performs better on their second serve in recent form? Labrana outperforms Glushkova, winning 40.51% of points compared to 37.75%.
- However, when it comes to returning second serves, Glushkova edges out Labrana, winning 50.49% of points versus 49.88%.
- Analyzing first serve returns, Glushkova has a noticeable advantage, winning 39.75% compared to Labrana's 31.87%.
- Saving breakpoints is crucial; Labrana has saved 45.98% of breakpoints, slightly better than Glushkova's 41.54%.
- Considering recent match results, Glushkova leads with a higher win rate of 67.9% over the last year, versus Labrana’s 58.82%.
- Is there a noticeable difference in players’ surfaces? Labrana excels on indoor hard courts with a win percentage of 71%, while Glushkova has her best performance on clay with 63% win rate.
- Level of play is important; Glushkova has played against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 369.25, compared to Labrana’s average of 413.76.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Labrana might be more confident, having won 65% in this scenario versus Glushkova's 53%.
- Which player is better at converting break points recently? Glushkova excels, converting 42.73% of opportunities, compared to Labrana’s 32.06%.
Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):
Taking a closer look at their recent performance and key statistics, both players exhibit unique strengths, but Glushkova slightly outshines Labrana in several areas.
Glushkova demonstrates a higher overall match win rate in the past year and consistently plays against stronger opponents, indicating an ability to compete at higher levels.
In terms of surface performance, although Labrana is strong on indoor hard courts, this particular match is likely influenced more by Glushkova’s ability to convert break points and return first serves effectively.
Moreover, Labrana's slightly better ability in deciding sets could be advantageous, yet this may not eclipse Glushkova's superior ability to seize opportunities during crucial points.
With careful consideration of these factors, Glushkova is the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Fernanda Labrana vs Denislava Glushkova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Labrana vs D. Glushkova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:29:20 | Average Match Time | 2:29:20 |
| 77% (54/70) | 1st Serve % | 67% (46/69) |
| 67% (36/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 31% (5/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Pts Won % | 80% (4/5) |
| 52% (36/69) | Return Points Win % | 41% (29/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Labrana Recent Matches Played
D. Glushkova Recent Matches Played

F. Labrana vs D. Glushkova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.01% (141/125) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.55% (152/91) |
| 53.27% (318/279) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.78% (327/211) |
| 52.09% (2869/2639) | Games Win/Loss | 55.22% (2634/2136) |
| 43.40% (23/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.16% (23/14) |
| 54.85% (113/93) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.62% (129/77) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 175 | Aces Total | 23 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 931 | Total Double Faults | 900 |
| 1:34:57 | Average Match Time | 1:49:5 |
| 435.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.75 |
| 66% (10027/15090) | 1st Serve % | 73% (9798/13506) |
| 59% (5901/10027) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (5357/9798) |
| 44% (2246/5063) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (1451/3708) |
| 47% (998/2112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (1153/2119) |
| 47% (7202/15208) | Return Points Win % | 53% (7186/13569) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 50.37% (68/67) | Challenger W/L | 59.06% (88/61) |
| 58.20% (71/51) | Futures W/L | 68.48% (63/29) |
| 53% (139/264) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (149/239) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 39% (20/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (28/40) |
| 43% (29/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (27/50) |
| 85% (149/127) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (145/134) |
| 15% (149/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (145/11) |
| 12% (117/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (98/17) |